🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of countries are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and apps are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to follow the Australian path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this international discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and others show that governments around the world are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.